Sharenet Sites 
Sharenet Sites
Significant New Intercept Confirms Down-Dip Continuity of High-Grade Copper Zone at Flat Mine
East, Okiep Copper
Orion Minerals Limited
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Australia
Australian Company Number 098 939 274
ASX share code: ORN
JSE share code: ORN
ISIN: AU000000ORN1
Significant New Intercept Confirms Down-Dip Continuity of High-Grade Copper Zone at Flat Mine East, Okiep Copper Project
Latest intercept of 3.96m at 4.64% Cu including 0.95m at 14.19% Cu extends geological model
• High-grade assay results received from recently completed diamond drill-hole OFMED158 at Flat Mine
East (FME):
o 3.96m at 4.64% Cu, including 0.95m at 14.19% Cu from 322.69m down-hole.
• The intersection in OFMED158 is located 39m down-dip of the previously reported high-grade copper
1
intercept in hole OMFED157 , which returned:
o 7.88m at 9.24% including 3.33m at 17.12% Cu from 311.26m down-hole.
• The results have confirmed the continuity of a high-grade, norite-hosted copper zone that remains
open at depth, highlighting the significant potential for grade and tonnage upside at FME.
• The mineralised interval in OFMED158 consists primarily of blebby to disseminated bornite and
chalcopyrite in norite.
• The OFMED157 intercept is located 36m down-dip from a previously reported high-grade copper
intersection in hole OFMED154, which returned:
o 78.00m at 1.57% Cu, including
o 15.00m at 4.80% Cu; and
o 9.27m at 3.01% Cu.
• Significantly, OFMED154 is located 50m along strike from a previously reported high-grade copper
intercept in hole OFMED153, which returned:
o 49.35m at 5.05% Cu, including:
o 21.66m at 9.41% Cu.
Orion's Managing Director and CEO, Tony Lennox, commented:
"These outstanding new high-grade drilling results from the Okiep Copper Project further strengthen the potential
upside at Flat Mine East. Crucially, this exciting intersection further extends the recently identified high-grade
copper zone down-dip and shows that it remains open at depth.
"The continuity of these high-grade intercepts provides compelling support to extend the geological model and
increase the size of the deposit. Importantly, it confirms that the mineralised system remains open and continues
well beyond the current mineral resource envelope and block model.
1 Refer ASX/JSE release 20 May 2026.
Orion Minerals Limited www.orionminerals.com.au
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Australia
Level 27, 120 Collins Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000 ASX Code: ORN
ACN: 098 939 274 JSE Code: ORN
Ordinary shares on issue: 8,954m I Options on issue: 726m ISIN: AU000000ORN1
----------------------- Page 2-----------------------
"These results further reinforce the quality and growth potential of the Flat Mines area as a cornerstone of Orion's
broader Okiep development strategy and will directly inform the next phase of our resource optimisation drilling
program."
Orion Minerals Limited (ASX/JSE: ORN) (Orion or Company) is pleased to report high-grade assay results from the
second drill hole completed as part of the current 2026 drilling campaign at the Okiep Copper Project (OCP)
Flat Mine East (FME) prospect, located in the Northern Cape of South Africa. Importantly, the assay results
reported in this announcement confirm the down-dip continuity of the mineralised norite unit intersected in
previously reported drill hole OFMED157 (refer ASX/JSE release 20 May 2026).
This significant high-grade intercept has further extended the deposit down-dip while also enhancing the
Company's understanding of the structural controls to mineralised mafic units, enabling Orion to further de-risk
its development strategy and prioritise targets for future high-impact exploration drilling.
The significant results being generated from the resource optimisation drilling program validate Orion's
development strategy for the OCP, building on the outstanding outcomes of the 2024 confirmation drilling
program – which confirmed the geology and endowment of the Flat Mines area (refer ASX/JSE releases 22 April
2024, 24 June 2024, 9 July 2024 and 3 September 2024).
The OCP ground holdings, which cover an area of 703km², encompass most of the Okiep copper mining district,
where a total of 105Mt is reported to have been mined over the past 100 years (refer ASX/JSE release 21 May
2021). Of the 105Mt mined, some 77Mt was mined on OCP prospecting and mining rights. The Flat Mines area
and the current drilling program fall entirely within executed Mining Right NC10150MR.
The Mining Right is surrounded by granted prospecting rights, NC12755PR and NC12848PR (refer ASX/JSE release
13 August 2024), which host several exciting historically drilled prospects and historical mines that offer the
potential for additional mineral resources through future drilling.
Orion reported an updated Mineral Resource of 10.0Mt at 1.3% Cu for the Flat Mines deposits in March 2025
2
(Table 1) , underpinned by historical drilling results (refer ASX/JSE release 28 March 2025).
2
Table 1: Mineral Resource Statement for Flat Mine North, Flat Mine East, Flat Mine South and Flat Mine Nababeep .
Measured Indicated Inferred
Mine / Prospect
Tonnes % Cu t Cu Tonnes % Cu t Cu Tonnes % Cu t Cu
Flat Mine North 440,000 1.13 5,000 940,000 1.42 13,000 200,000 1.50 4,000
Flat Mine East - - - 3,400,000 1.37 47,000 1,000,000 1.00 9,000
Flat Mine South - - - 2,600,000 1.35 35,000 800,000 1.60 13,000
Flat Mine Nababeep - - - 300,000 1.07 3,000 300,000 1.00 3,000
Total* 440,000 1.13 5,000 7,240,000 1.30 98,000 2,300,000 1.30 29,000
*Numbers may not add up due to rounding in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) guidance.
Resources are reported at a 0.7% Cu cut-off grade.
Flat Mine East (FME) – Resource Optimisation Drilling Program Update
FME drill hole OFMED158, which was designed to target down-dip extensions of previously reported high-grade
mineralisation intersected in OFMED157, has confirmed the down-dip continuity of that high-grade copper zone,
returning an intercept of 3.96m at 4.64% Cu, including 0.95m at 14.19% Cu from 322.69m down -hole.
The result extends the mineralised zone down-dip by 39m beyond OFMED157.
2 Mineral Resource reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) in ASX release of 28 March 2025: "Orion Updates Mineral Resources
at Okiep Copper Project" available to the public on https://www.orionminerals.com.au/asx-jse-announcements/. Competent
Person: Paul Matthews. Orion confirms it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included above.
The Company confirms that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the original release continue
to apply and have not materially changed. Orion confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented
have not been materially modified.
2
----------------------- Page 3-----------------------
Although narrower than the intercept in OFMED157, this result confirms the geological continuity of this high-
grade zone. Furthermore, the data extends the geological model down-dip, highlighting opportunities to target
deeper extensions.
The current intercepts confirm the down-dip continuity of the FME lower zone, where significant mineralisation
was previously reported in OFMED154, including assays of 15.00m at 4.80% Cu and 9.27m at 3.01% Cu within
78.00m at 1.57% Cu (refer ASX/JSE release 24 June 2024). Significantly, OFMED154 is located 50m along strike to
the east from previously reported high-grade copper mineralisation in hole OFMED153, which returned 49.35m
at 5.05% Cu including 21.66m at 9.41% Cu (refer ASX/JSE release 24 June 2024).
These results provide strong support for follow-up drilling. By integrating these results with insights from an ongoing
geophysical survey, Orion can further refine drill targets and enhance the potential for discovery success across
the broader FME area.
Figure 1: Plan showing historical and Orion (green-labelled) drill holes, including OFMED158 at Flat Mine East, interpreted
mineralisation envelopes and extent of the Mining Right.
Table 2: Summary table of assay drill results for OFMED158 at FME prospect (as analysed by ICP-MS, minimum cut-off of 0.7%
Cu with maximum 3m consecutive internal waste allowed). Intersections and inclusions with average grades above 1% Cu
are tabulated. The data were not capped. Note: widths are down-hole drill widths.
Mineralisation
Hole ID
Notes From (m) To (m) Interval (m) % Cu
322.27 326.23 3.96 4.64
OFMED158
including 322.27 323.22 0.95 14.19
including 324.22 326.23 2.0 1 2.10
3
----------------------- Page 4-----------------------
Figure 2: Cross-section of OFMED158 with assay results plotted, with adjacent holes. Mineralisation model not yet updated to
incorporate new drill hole intersections.
For and on behalf of the Board.
Tony Lennox
Managing Director and CEO
29 June 2026 4
----------------------- Page 5-----------------------
ENQUIRIES
Investors Media JSE Sponsor
Avishkar Nagaser Nicholas Read Monique Martinez
Executive: Corporate Communications Read Corporate, Australia Merchantec Capital
and Investor Relations
T: +61 (0) 3 8080 7170 T: +61 (0) 419 929 046 T: +27 (0) 11 325 6363
E: info@orionminerals.com.au E: nicholas@readcorporate.com.au E: monique.martinez@merchantec.com
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr John Paul Hunt
(Pr.Sci.Nat.), a Competent Person who is a member of the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professionals, a
Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO). Mr Hunt is a full-time employee of Orion. Mr Hunt has sufficient experience that
is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to
qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code. Mr Hunt consents to the inclusion in this
announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Reference to Previous Reports
Exploration Results from previous drilling at Flat Mines area were reported in ASX/JSE releases of 20 May 2026: "Exceptional
High-Grade Copper Intercept - Okiep Project" Competent Person: John Paul Hunt, 12 May 2026: "Drilling Extends Significant
Copper Mineralisation at Okiep" Competent Person: John Paul Hunt, 22 April 2024: "Spectacular High-Grade Copper
Intercept at Okiep Project" Competent Person: Paul Matthews, 24 June 2024: "More Outstanding Hits at Okiep Copper
Project" Competent Person: Paul Matthews, 9 July 2024: "Okiep Copper Project Continues to Deliver" Competent Person:
Paul Matthews and 3 September 2024: "Okiep Confirmation Drilling Successfully Completed" Competent Person: Paul
Matthews, and Mineral Resources at Flat Mines are reported in ASX release of 28 March 2025: "Orion Updates Mineral
Resources at Okiep Copper Project" Competent Person: Paul Matthews, all available to the public on
https://www.orionminerals.com.au/asx-jse-announcements/. Orion confirms that it is not aware of any new information or
data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. Orion confirms that all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource estimates in the original release continue to apply
and have not materially changed. Orion confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are
presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.
Disclaimer
This release may include forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements may include, among other things,
statements regarding targets, estimates and assumptions in respect of metal production and prices, operating costs and
results, capital expenditures, mineral reserves and mineral resources and anticipated grades and recovery rates, and are or
may be based on assumptions and estimates related to future technical, economic, market, political, social and other
conditions. These forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward-looking statements inherently involve subjective judgement and analysis and are necessarily subject to risks,
uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Orion. Actual results and developments may vary
materially from those expressed in this release. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on such forward-looking statements. Orion makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking
statements made in this release to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release. All information in respect of
Exploration Results and other technical information should be read in conjunction with Competent Person Statements in this
release (where applicable). To the maximum extent permitted by law, Orion and any of its related bodies corporate and
affiliates and their officers, employees, agents, associates and advisers:
• disclaim any obligations or undertaking to release any updates or revisions to the information to reflect any change in
expectations or assumptions;
• do not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the
information in this release, or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or results expressed
or implied in any forward-looking statement; and
• disclaim all responsibility and liability for these forward-looking statements (including, without limitation, liability for
negligence).
5
----------------------- Page 6-----------------------
Appendix 1: Drill hole collar information for Flat Mine East and assay results from drill hole at Flat Mine East.
Table 3: Drill hole collar information for FMN and FME prospects. Coordinates in LO17 Hartebeesthoek 94.
Prospect Hole ID Easting Northing RL Azimuth Dip Depth (m) Comment
FMN OFMND244 -75919.82 3268275.00 816.33 240 -80 200.00 Completed
FMN OFMND245 -75925.46 3268228.85 818.69 230 -83 210.00 Completed
FMN OFMND246 -76015.49 3268297.29 819.62 180 -70 162.51 Completed
FMN OFMND247 -75924.17 3268227.67 818.58 290 -70 210.00 Completed
FMN OFMND248 -76092.38 3268052.30 839.25 240 -71 231.90 Completed
FME OFMED157 -78607.46 3270337.03 977.85 185 -66 340.25 Completed
FME OFMED158 -78607.46 3270337.03 977.85 180 -74 352.43 Completed
Table 4: OFMED158 drill hole assay results.
Hole ID From (m) To (m) % Cu
OFMED158 317.00 318.00 0.01
OFMED158 318.00 319.00 0.01
OFMED158 319.00 320.00 0.01
OFMED158 320.00 321.00 0.03
OFMED158 321.00 322.27 0.29
OFMED158 322.27 322.69 10.70
OFMED158 322.69 323.22 16.95
OFMED158 323.22 323.72 0.48
OFMED158 323.72 324.22 0.87
OFMED158 324.22 324.70 2.30
OFMED158 324.70 325.19 2.70
OFMED158 325.19 325.72 0.17
OFMED158 325.72 326.23 3.32
OFMED158 326.23 326.70 0.36
OFMED158 326.70 327.30 0.21
OFMED158 327.30 328.00 0.08
OFMED158 328.00 329.00 0.02
OFMED158 329.00 330.00 0.00
OFMED158 330.00 331.00 0.00
OFMED158 331.00 332.00 0.00
6
----------------------- Page 7-----------------------
Appendix 2: The following tables are provided in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results from the
Okiep Copper Project.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or • Sampling was carried out using industry-standard diamond drilling
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to procedures. NQ-size diamond drill cores were longitudinally split in half
the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or using a diamond core cutting machine. Half core was cut to quarter
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as core where field duplicates were taken.
limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • HQ core size was only drilled in the upper weathered portion, and no HQ
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity core was sampled.
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems • One-metre and fifty-centimetre sample length was taken in the case
used. of OFMED158. Sample lengths were varied to honour geological and
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the mineralisation boundaries, with a maximum sample size of 1.27m and a
Public Report. minimum sample size of 42cm.
• In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be • Areas of sampling were selected based on visual observations and
relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m readings from a handheld Niton XL3t 500 XRF analyser (standard
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for analytical range >25 elements from S to U with additional elements Mg, Al,
fire assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as Si and P via helium purge).
where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling techniques • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air • Diamond core drilling was undertaken.
blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple • HQ and NQ size core was drilled using a standard tube, HQ core size was
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other only drilled in the upper weathered portion of approximately 6m. No Cu
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). mineralisation was visually identified in the HQ core, and no HQ core was
sampled.
• Core was not oriented.
Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries • Core 'stick-ups' reflecting the depth of the drill hole are recorded at the rig
and results assessed. at the end of each core run. A block with the depth of the hole written
• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure on it is placed in the core box at the end of each run. At the core yard,
representative nature of the samples. the length of core in the core box is measured for each run. The measured
length of core is subtracted from the length of the run as recorded from
• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade the stick-up measured at the rig to determine the core loss.
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • Core recovery was found to be very good (>98%) within the mineralised
zone.
• Ground conditions below the weathered zone were very good.
• No obvious relationship exists between sample recovery and grade.
• No core/sample loss or gain which could result in sample bias.
7
----------------------- Page 8-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and • Core of the entire hole length was geologically logged by qualified
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate geologists.
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical • The core was logged to a level of detail that is sufficient to support
studies. appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or metallurgical studies.
costean, channel, etc) photography. • Geological logging was qualitative and was carried out using a
• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. standard sheet with a set of standard logging codes to describe
lithology, structure and mineralisation. The logging sheet allows for free-
form description to note any unusual features.
• Geological logs were captured electronically.
• All cores were photographed before sampling.
• Geotechnical logging was completed on non-oriented core. The data
collected per drill run consisted of core recovery, length of core
greater than ten centimetres, longest piece, fracture count, alpha
angles for all joint types and lithological contacts, joint infill types and
their strength as well as nature of joint surface.
Sub-sampling • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core • NQ core was cut, and half core was taken as sample with quarter core
techniques and taken. for duplicates.
sample preparation • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and • HQ core size was only drilled in the upper weathered portion, and no
whether sampled wet or dry. HQ core was sampled.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the • Sample preparation was undertaken at ALS Laboratory Johannesburg
sample preparation technique. (ALS), an ISO accredited laboratory, and is considered appropriate.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to ALS utilises industry best practice for sample preparation for analysis
maximise representivity of samples. involving drying of samples, weighing samples, crushing to <2mm if
required. Crushed samples are riffle-split and a 250g portion pulverised
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ with +85% passing through 75 microns.
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling. • Crushing and pulverising QC tests were applied by ALS and results
found acceptable.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
being sampled. • Quarter core field duplicates were taken for 3 samples with acceptable results
at a correlation factor of 0.9.
• All sample sizes are deemed appropriate.
Quality of assay data • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and Flat Mine East drill hole results reported in this release:
and laboratory tests laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered • Areas of core were selected based on visual observations and
partial or total. readings from a handheld Niton XL3t 500 XRF (pXRF) analyser (standard
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the analytical range >25 elements from S to U with additional elements Mg,
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make Al, Si and P via helium purge).
and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their • Samples submitted to ALS were analysed for base metals and gold.
derivation, etc • All samples were analysed by an appropriate high-grade aqua regia
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
8
----------------------- Page 9-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable ICP-AES method, ALS code ME-ICP41a.
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been • Samples where assays returned >5% Cu were re-assayed by aqua regia
established. digestion and ICP-AES method, ALS code MEOG-46.
• Samples were assayed for gold by fire assay and AAS, ALS code AU-
AA25 method.
• Orion inserted CRMs every 10th sample. A total of three CRMs were
inserted. CRMs were alternated throughout the sample stream and
where possible, matched to the sample material being analysed.
• CRM AMIS0809 (3.01%Cu) was used.
• All CRMs returned acceptable results within two Standard Deviations of
the CRM average.
• Chip blanks are inserted at the beginning of each batch and after any
sample that may be considered high grade. A total of two blanks from
AMIS0991 were used. Acceptable results were returned indicating no
contamination.
• The laboratory conducts their own checks which are also monitored.
The accuracy and precision of the geochemical data reported on has
deemed to be acceptable.
• Results from the three-quarter core field duplicates showed a
correlation coefficient of 0.9.
• No external laboratory checks have been carried out at this stage.
Verification of • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or • Orion's exploration geologist personally supervised the drilling and
Sampling and assaying alternative company personnel. sampling along with a team of experienced geologists.
• The use of twinned holes. • No twin holes were drilled.
• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data • The mineralisation intersection in OFMED158 is located approximately
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. 39m from the mineralised intersection in OFMED157 which was recently
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data. drilled as part of the Orion optimisation drilling program. The geology
broadly corresponds, however, the width of the norite zone is narrower
in OFMED158 compared to OFMED157.
• The Competent Person has reviewed the raw laboratory data and
confirmed the calculation of the significant intersections.
• No adjustments have been made to the assay data.
Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and • Collar positions of the FME prospect hole was initially located using a
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in hand-held Garmin GPS and subsequently surveyed by a qualified
Mineral Resource estimation. surveyor using a differential GPS.
• Specification of the grid system used. • On completion drill collars are capped and labelled.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • The local South African Lo17 (Hartebeesthoek 94) grid system is used.
• All the FME and FMN holes have been surveyed down-hole. An ITC
9
----------------------- Page 10-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Gyroshot serial number 3033 used for the down-hole surveys.
Data spacing and • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • OFMED158 intersected mineralisation approximately 39 metres from
distribution • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the mineralisation intersected in drill hole OFMED157. The hole was drilled
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the to test for down-dip continuity.
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and • The drill spacing is considered sufficient to establish the degree of
classifications applied. geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
• Whether sample compositing has been applied. and Ore Reserve estimation and classifications.
• Mostly one-metre samples were taken in unmineralised footwall and
hangingwall zone to mineralisation and fifty-centimetre samples
collected in the mineralised zone of OFMED158.
Orientation of data in • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of • To achieve unbiased sampling, drilling is oriented as close as practically
relation to geological possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the possible to perpendicular, or at a maximum achievable angle, to the
structure deposit type. attitude of the mineralisation. OFME158 was inclined at -74°. No
• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of sampling bias is anticipated as a result of drill hole orientations.
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Chain of custody is managed by the Company. Samples were stored on site
in a secure locked building and then freighted directly to the laboratory.
Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • No audits or reviews have been carried out to date for this drill
campaign.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including • The mineral rights to the properties are vested in the peoples of South
land tenure status agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, Africa and the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, 2002, (MPRDA) regulates the prospecting and mining industry in South
wilderness or national park and environmental settings. Africa.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any Newmont and GFSA:
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • O'Okiep Copper Company (Pty) Ltd (OCC), historically owned at
different times by Newmont, GFSA and Metorex, held vast areas under
an old order (prior to the MPRDA) mining right.
Orion:
• Flat Mines Mining Right. A mining right, NC30/5/1/2/2/10150MR was
granted on 28 July 2022 to Southern African Tantalum Mining (Pty) Ltd
10
----------------------- Page 11-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
(SAFTA) in terms of section 23 of the MPRDA to mine for a period of
fifteen years. The right may be renewed for periods of up to 30 years.
The mining right was ceded to Orion indirect subsidiary, New Okiep
Mining Company (Pty) Ltd (NOMC) on 12 December 2023. The right is
for copper ore and tungsten are over a portion of portion 3, a portion
of portion 13, a portion of portion 14 and a portion of portion 21 of the
farm Nababeep No 134 situated within the Administrative District of
Namaqualand. The area measures 1,214Ha in extent.
• A prospecting right NC30/5/1/1/2/12850PR was granted on 27 June
2023 to SAFTA in terms of section 17 of the MPRDA for the same area as
the mining right for 3 years (renewable for 3 years) for 26 additional
minerals including gold and silver.
• SAFTA PR. A prospecting right, NC30/5/1/1/2/12755PR was granted on
21 June 2024 to SAFTA in terms of section 17 of the MPRDA to prospect
for a period of 3 years, renewable for 3 years. The right is for copper ore
and tungsten ore for portion of Portion 3, portion of Portion 10, portion
of Portion 13, portion of Portion 14, Portion 15, Portion 16, portion of
Portion 21 of the farm Nababeep 134 and Okiep Township Plot 2086.
situated within the Administrative District of Namaqualand. The total
area measures 7, 164Ha in extent.
• A prospecting right NC30/5/1/1/2/12848PR was granted on 21 June
2024 to SAFTA in terms of section 17 of the MPRDA for the same area as
the prospecting right NC12755PR for 3 years (renewable for 3 years) for
26 additional minerals including gold and silver.
• Orion acquired 56.25% of the tenement rights through the SAFTA-Orion
Acquisition Agreement. The remaining 43.75% is held by the Industrial
Development Corporation of South Africa (IDC) (refer ASX/JSE releases
2 August 2021, 7 September 2022, 14 November 2022, 17 April 2024 and
6 May 2024). Applications for Section 11 consent in terms of the MPRDA
to cede the rights to NOMC are submitted once each right is granted
and are in preparation and process.
• The area was mined historically for copper and tungsten.
Exploration done by • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Previous explorers in the region includes Newmont, GFSA and SAFTA.
other parties Exploration was focussed on Cu.
• Extensive historical drilling data (480 holes totalling 126,601m) is
contained in the database inherited from Newmont, GFSA and SAFTA
for FME, FMN and FMS. This includes 247 holes totalling 42,738m at FMN,
151 holes totalling 50,583m at FME and 82 holes totalling 33,280m at
FMS.
• Sample and analytical details are contained within JORC Table 1 of
Orion's ASX/JSE release dated 28 August 2023.
11
----------------------- Page 12-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The tenements are located over the Central and Western parts of the
Okiep Copper District (OCD). The style of mineralisation is mafic hosted
orogenic Cu-mineralisation.
• Copper mineralisation is primarily associated with irregular, elongated
and steeply dipping Koperberg Suite mafic intrusives.
• The Koperberg Suite intrusives are mainly restricted to so-called "Steep
Structures" of extensive strike lengths and steeply dipping to the north.
• The Koperberg Suite consists of intermediate to mafic rock types,
predominated by anorthosite, diorite and norite.
• Mineralisation usually occurs as blebs to disseminated Cu mineral
assemblages: bornite > chalcopyrite > chalcocite and less pyrite and
pyrrhotite.
• The more mafic and magnetite-rich lithologies generally host the bulk
of and higher-grade mineralisation.
• The OCD has a long exploration and mining history, and the geology is
well known and understood.
Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the • Refer to Table 3 in Appendix 1 for collar details of drill hole reported.
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above
sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, • A minimum 0.7% Cu cut-off was used to calculate intercepts.
methods maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high • Allowance was made for 3m internal waste.
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • No high grades were cut.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade • Weighted grades were calculated as follows: %Cu x sample length(m)
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for
such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of • The Competent Person is of the opinion that the above aggregation
such aggregations should be shown in detail. methods are acceptable for this type of deposit.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values • These aggregation methods were also applied to historical holes and
12
----------------------- Page 13-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
should be clearly stated. assay results in previous announcements.
• No metal equivalents are reported.
• No capping of assay results was required.
Relationship between • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of • Drilling is generally oriented perpendicular, or at a maximum
mineralisation widths Exploration Results. achievable angle to, the attitude of the mineralisation.
and intercept lengths • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole • Generally, drill hole inclinations ranged between -65° to -75° towards the
angle is known, its nature should be reported. south for FME while the mineralisation is expected to dip close to 50-75°
• If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should towards the north. Drill hole inclinations at FMN generally north or south at
be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not steep angles between -75 to vertical due to the shallow, 15°, north dipping
known'). mineralisation.
• Down-hole lengths are reported in all instances apart from where true widths (TW)
are specified.
• Where true widths (TW) are specified, they are calculated by measuring
the intersection width perpendicular to the interpreted mineralisation
trend.
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of • Refer to body of the announcement for plan, cross-section and tables.
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being • Drilling data was incorporated and monitored in Micromine™ software
reported These should include but not be limited to a plan view of drill together with interpretation models based on the available historical drill
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. data.
Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not • In the Competent Person's opinion, the Exploration Results reported in this
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades announcement have been reported in a balanced manner.
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Other substantive • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported • The Company's previous ASX releases have detailed exploration works.
exploration data including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey • Surface MT geophysical surveys are being undertaken. The objective of
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of the work is to explore for deeper structures that may have acted as
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, pathways for emplacement of the Koperberg mafic suites.
geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances. • A high-resolution drone magnetic survey was carried out and will assist in
future planning of additional drill holes.
• Drone (DJI 600M Pro) magnetics were done at 30m AGL and 50m line
spacing.
• Historical detailed surface mapping is interpreted and utilised during drill
hole planning.
• Where possible, bulk density measurements were made over the full
length of each individual sample of split core. Where not possible due to
incompetent (crushed or broken) core, a minimum of 80% of the (half-
core) sample was used. The bulk density is determined by measuring and
subtracting the wet weight from the dry weight using an electronic scale.
Care is taken to clean and zero the scale between each weighing. The
13
----------------------- Page 14-----------------------
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
intact sample portion is first weighed in air and the weight recorded. The
sample is then weighed, while completely submerged in clean water
within a measuring container. The mass of container and water are
deducted for net submerged weight and volume displacement read on
measuring container. The sample is then removed and placed back into
the core tray in the correct position and orientation. The procedure is
repeated for each geological sample interval. The data were recorded in
the bulk density Data Sheet. The bulk density is calculated for each sample
using the formula:
BD = weight of sample
(weight of sample in air – weight of the sample in water)
Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral • Evaluation of the current drill results at Flat Mine East prospect is ongoing,
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). to inform possible follow up resource extension drilling.
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including
the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive.
14
Date: 29-06-2026 08:45:00
Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE').
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
information disseminated through SENS.
